Howard speaks up on AID Budget. Apparently it is impossible to make promises beyond 2010 for foreign aid, as you couldn’t be held accountable for it..hmmmm.
“But to promise something way out to 2015, which is eight years, is easy to do because you can’t really be held accountable for it.”
I wonder Mr Howard if you have heard of timetabled commitments.. It’s a relatively simple idea, if you are going to reach 0.7% GNI on AID by say 2015, you work out how much you’d need to increase it each year to meet it. Simple accountability.
“We have significantly increased our foreign aid, we’ve doubled it, and it’s working,” he said.
As for the doubling of foreign aid, you haven’t doubled the percentage we spend since you and your team got office. You have doubled the artificially low dollar amount after a decade of disengagement. Also very clever use of Iraq and the pacific solution in the numbers. However the money we do send is appreciated a lot by the people it actually manages to reach.
“The rich world can do more to help the starving people of struggling countries by getting rid of corruption in the governments of those countries and … also by removing trade barriers.”
You make an interesting point about governance, but I’d like to point out that a sizable part of our aid budget goes to top down governance programs already. As our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan seem to suggest we can’t get rid of corruption in a country, even if we invade it. The key to stopping corruption is to empower locals at all levels to hold their governments accountable. Even Australia, and our close ally America struggle with corruption. Someone more cynical then myself may suggest that tax cuts as election promises are a way of buying votes.