I heard a sermon tonight that talked about the three layers of marital love. The three layers he talked about where passion/romance love, friendship love, and commitment love. It said some things that quite annoyed me.
One it suggested that God was going to provide you with your wife/husband. This implied that there was something wrong if you never ended up getting married.
The second was that it was suggested that, in dating friendship love was the thing to seek and that commitment love only happens at the altar. It also said that unconditional love was only shared by married people and God and humans. I think that this is a flawed argument. I personally have many friends that whatever they did I would still love them. I might not be able to continue to relate to them in some extreme cases but I would still love them.
Part of my problem I think is the use of absolute and overly simplified terms, to describe human relationships. I don’t think it works. I understand the need to simplify things, so we can get our heads around them. It’s what I do as an engineer in training. Engineers work with models of the world that make it easier to calculate things, and work out solutions to problems. You never forget though that what you have worked out is based on a model which assumes a great many things that may not be true. If the model is good you might not have too many problems when you use your solution in the real world. Sometimes though your models don’t work at all in the real world.
I think if we recognised the assumptions and simplification of psychological models and religious models we would deal with real world complexity much better.